RIVERMARK / ENERGY ASSESSMENTPROPOSAL
A useful plan starts
with the right questions.
Assess three public buildings. Identify practical improvements. Give the client a clear basis for deciding what to do next.
Understand the current position
We propose reviewing twelve months of energy records alongside a site survey for each building. Conversations with facilities teams will help explain how the spaces are used and where operational constraints affect the options.
Compare realistic options
Each recommendation will identify the work involved, an indicative cost range and any further investigation needed. Savings estimates will state their assumptions; they will not be presented as guaranteed results.
Leave the client with a decision
The final report will group recommendations into immediate operational changes and longer-term works, with a proposed sequence for considering them.
Prepared from the opportunity brief and applicant evidence.01
RIVERMARK / ENERGY ASSESSMENTCOST BREAKDOWN
Make the numbers
part of the argument.
Illustrative planning estimates in USD. Rates and tax treatment need client confirmation.
Assessment and reporting costs| Work item | Basis | Total |
|---|
| Building surveys | 3 × $1,200 | $3,600 |
|---|
| Energy analysis | 60 hrs × $120 | $7,200 |
|---|
| Client workshops | 2 × $900 | $1,800 |
|---|
| Report & recommendations | 45 hrs × $120 | $5,400 |
|---|
| Estimated total, excluding tax | $18,000 |
|---|
What this covers
Assessment, analysis, client discussions and a written recommendation. Installation, specialist testing and statutory approvals are outside this illustrative scope.
Why it is structured this way
Every cost corresponds to an activity in the delivery plan, so the client can see what they are paying for and challenge an assumption before committing.
Budget justification with a budget table in Competitive.02
RIVERMARK / ENERGY ASSESSMENTDELIVERY PLAN
Show what happens.
And what it depends on.
An illustrative six-week programme, subject to access and timely receipt of the building records.
- WEEK 01
Agree the starting point
Confirm scope, obtain records and schedule access. Owner: project lead.
- WEEKS 02–03
Survey and analyse
Visit the three sites and assess the data. Owner: assessment team.
- WEEK 04
Test the options together
Discuss recommendations and operating constraints with the client. Owner: project lead.
- WEEKS 05–06
Deliver the recommendation
Present the report, cost ranges and proposed priorities. Owner: project lead.
Dependency to resolve Missing consumption records may limit the confidence of savings estimates. Confirm data availability before agreeing the final scope.
Work-plan table in Competitive.03